Yes. Aesthetix Global runs twelve Odoo modules on one database covering project management, documents, purchase, inventory, accounting, employees, attendance, leave, timesheets, assets, approvals and dashboards. Engineering, procurement, construction, finance and HR write to the same records, so there are no connectors, no nightly sync and no reconciliation job.

Because EPC fails at the seams. Engineering, procurement and construction have to share one version of the truth. The moment they live in separate systems, reconciliation becomes someone's full-time job, and the reconciliation is always late. One data model removes that job entirely.

An approval is raised in the project context, routed automatically to the right approver, escalated when it stalls, and closed with a full audit trail. It was built as a configurable workflow engine in Odoo Approvals with custom routing logic, and it was the first thing to go live, because in EPC a stalled approval is a stalled site.

Yes. MICs are a compliance and quality choke point in EPC, so they were brought into the system with structured capture and approval rather than living in a folder. Each MIC is a record tied to the project and material it concerns, with the same routing and audit trail as any other approval.

Through a single governed repository in Odoo Documents: version-controlled drawings and specifications, full revision history per deliverable, an auditable change trail by user and date, and one retrieval point for every discipline. Deliverables are linked to the project schedule, so a late drawing shows as a late milestone.

The budget is held inside the project record and tracked live against committed and incurred cost, with variance visible during execution. A purchase commits cost the moment it is approved, so an overrun shows before the invoice arrives. Profitability becomes a control lever rather than a post-mortem.

Requisitions are raised against the project that needs the material, vendor management is structured in Odoo Purchase, and logistics is visible in the same flow through Inventory. Because the requisition is the only route to a purchase, informal off-system buying stopped, and material stopped arriving late, early or in the wrong quantity.

Timesheets, attendance and leave were unified with man-hour planning, so plan and actual sit in one place. Hours are captured where the work happens rather than re-keyed in the office, which gives accurate labour cost per project and a credible basis for resourcing and bidding the next one.

Yes. Odoo's asset management gives one central register of company assets, with location, allocation, condition and lifecycle, across every project and every country. Asset utilisation, what is deployed, where and on what, is one of the six views on the executive dashboard.

Project health (milestones, deliverables and slippage), budget vs actual while the project is running, procurement status, man-hour consumption against plan, approval bottlenecks and who holds them, and asset utilisation. Because every department writes to the same system, the report is always there rather than compiled at month end.

Through a phased delivery: requirement discovery walked the real workflow department by department, the solution was designed around it, configuration and custom development followed, then data migration, user acceptance testing against live project scenarios, department-by-department training, go-live, and post-go-live support through stabilisation.

KoderXpert is an Odoo Ready Partner that walks the workflow before touching the software, sequences delivery so the most painful bottleneck is fixed first, and builds what EPC actually needs in Python and QWeb rather than bending the business to the product. Talk to KoderXpert about your projects.